Understanding Plato’s Meno: A Guide to Ancient Wisdom

Have you ever thought about the old-school chats that laid down the tracks for how we think today? Look no further than Plato’s Meno. Socrates and Meno get into it, tossing around big ideas about what virtue is and whether you can teach someone to be virtuous. Written around 385 BC, this piece isn’t just a relic; it’s a cornerstone of philosophical inquiry that still stirs debate. Digging through the history of Athens and our ongoing journey to grasp what makes us tick, it’s clear this topic hasn’t lost its edge.

Intrigued by how ideas centuries-old influence us today? You’re not alone. The discussion between Socrates and his companions unfolds theories on knowledge, truth, and ethics—concepts as pivotal now as they were then.

Table of Contents:

• What Is Plato’s Meno?
  • Overview of the Dialogue, Dramatic Setting, Summary of Arguments in Three Main Stages
• Major Themes in Plato’s Meno
  • Virtue and Knowledge
  • Recollection and Innate Ideas
  • Teaching and Learning
  • Theory and Practice
• Can Virtue Be Taught?
  • Socrates’ Argument
  • Meno’s Objections
  • The Role of Knowledge
  • The Paradox of Inquiry
• The Doctrine of Recollection
  • Socrates’ Demonstration
  • The Theory of Reincarnation
  • Implications for Learning
  • Criticisms of the Doctrine
• True Belief vs. Knowledge
  • Distinguishing Between the Two
  • The Value of Each
  • How They Are Acquired
  • Socrates’ Examples
• The Socratic Method in the Meno
  • Questioning as a Means of Inquiry
  • Exposing Ignorance
  • Guiding Towards Truth
  • Limitations of the Method
• Historical and Philosophical Context
  • Plato’s Life and Works
  • The Sophists
  • Athens in the 5th Century BCE
  • Influence on Later Thought
• Conclusion

What Is Plato’s Meno?

Plato’s Meno is a game-changing platonic dialogue that dives deep into the question: what exactly is virtue?

It’s a classic back-and-forth between Socrates and his buddies, especially Meno. The dialogue is one of Plato’s early works, but it packs a punch.

Overview of the Dialogue, Dramatic Setting, Summary of Arguments in Three Main Stages

The Meno is set in Athens around 402 BCE, and it’s divided into three main parts:

1. Meno’s attempts to define virtue
2. Socrates’ famous geometry lesson with a slave boy
3. The question of whether virtue can be taught

In typical Socratic dialogue fashion, Socrates keeps pushing Meno to think about what virtue means. It’s not just a simple definition – it’s a deep philosophical question.

And then there’s the mind-blowing scene where Socrates teaches a slave boy geometry. He’s trying to show that learning is just recollecting knowledge already inside us.

“These notions have just been stirred up in him, as in a dream.” – Socrates, in Plato’s Meno

The dialogue ends with a discussion of whether virtue can be taught. Socrates has his doubts, but he’s open to the possibility.

Major Themes in Plato’s Meno: Plato’s Meno

The Meno covers some seriously deep topics central to Plato’s philosophy. Let’s break it down:

Virtue and Knowledge

The big question is: what counts as virtue? And how is it related to knowledge?

Meno’s first stab at a definition is just a list of different virtues for different people. But Socrates isn’t satisfied with that. He wants to know what ties all those examples together.

“The implication is that a direct answer to Socrates’ question would simply be: what virtue is depends entirely on the kind of person.” – Rachana Kamtekar, in Plato’s Meno

Meno’s second attempt is to say that virtue is desiring beautiful things and having the power to get them. But Socrates pokes holes in that, too.

The link between virtue and knowledge is a major theme in Plato’s philosophy. He sees them as intimately connected—you can’t have one without the other.

Recollection and Innate Ideas: Plato’s Meno

This is where the geometry lesson with the slave boy comes in. Socrates is trying to show that the boy already knew him – he just needed to “recollect” it.

“The principle here is that one cannot know a part of a thing without some awareness of the overriding concept of things.” – Jacob Klein, in A Commentary on Plato’s Meno

We’re born with certain innate ideas, and learning is just a matter of remembering what we already know. This ties into Plato’s famous theory of forms.

Teaching and Learning

Can virtue be taught? That’s the million-dollar question.

Socrates is skeptical because he doesn’t see any clear examples of virtuous people successfully teaching others to be virtuous.

But he’s open to the idea that virtue is a kind of knowledge, and knowledge can be taught. So maybe it’s possible after all.

“Socrates calls over one of Meno’s enslaved attendants and asks the boy, who has no mathematical experience, to solve a geometry problem. With Socrates’ guidance, the boy discovers how to double the area of a square, and Socrates suggests to Meno that what appears to be learning, then, was merely recollection.” – Rebecca Newberger Goldstein, in Plato at the Googleplex

The dialogue doesn’t give a definitive answer, but it raises some fascinating questions about the nature of teaching and learning.

Theory and Practice

There’s a tension in Meno between abstract theory and concrete practice. Meno is all about practical results—he wants to know how to actually be virtuous, not just talk about it.

But Socrates insists that we need to start by clearly understanding virtue before we can figure out how to achieve it in practice.

It’s a classic philosophical debate: do ideas come before action, or does action shape our ideas? The Meno suggests that it’s a bit of both.

Can Virtue Be Taught?

This question kicks off the whole dialogue, and it’s still hotly debated today. Can we learn to be good, or is it just something we’re born with?

Socrates’ Argument

Socrates is pretty skeptical about the idea that virtue can be taught. His main argument is that he doesn’t see any clear examples of virtuous people successfully teaching others to be virtuous.

“Socrates suggests that virtue as practiced in our world both depends on true belief rather than knowledge and is received as some kind of divine gift.” – Roslyn Weiss, in Virtue in the Cave

He points out that even great Athenian leaders like Pericles and Themistocles didn’t manage to pass their virtue on to their sons. If virtue could be taught, wouldn’t we expect to see more examples of it being passed down in families?

Meno’s Objections: Plato’s Meno

Meno responds to Socrates’ argument. He suggests that there may be virtuous people out there who could teach virtue, but they’re rare.

He also wonders if virtue can be learned through practice and experience rather than formal teaching.

“Meno is persuaded that he should, as Socrates urges, ‘allow virtue to remain whole and sound’ and attempt to give an account of what binds all the examples of virtue he listed together.” – Rachana Kamtekar, in Plato’s Meno

These are good points, and they show that the question isn’t as simple as it might seem at first glance.

Socrates suggests that virtue might be a kind of knowledge, and knowledge can be taught. So, if we could figure out what kind of knowledge virtue is, maybe we could figure out how to teach it.

But he also acknowledges that this is a big “if.” It’s unclear whether virtue is a kind of knowledge or what kind it might be.

The Paradox of Inquiry: Plato’s Meno

The dialogue ends with a famous paradox. If we don’t know what virtue is, how can we even begin to inquire about it? But why would we need to inquire if we already know what it is?

“Meno embarks on a rather fruitless attempt to show that one cannot investigate something about which one is uncertain: ‘how will you look for [virtue] when you do not know what it is.'” – Gail Fine, in Inquiry in the Meno

This paradox highlights the deep difficulties involved in defining and understanding abstract concepts like virtue. Philosophers are still grappling with this challenge today.

So, where does that leave us? Meno doesn’t give any easy answers, but it does give us a lot to think about. It challenges us to examine our assumptions about virtue, knowledge, and the nature of learning.

And it reminds us that sometimes the most important questions are the ones that don’t have clear answers. The search for wisdom is an ongoing process, not a destination.

That’s the beauty of Plato’s dialogues – they don’t just tell us what to think, but they invite us to think for ourselves. And that’s a pretty virtuous thing to do.

The Doctrine of Recollection: Plato’s Meno

In Plato’s Meno, Socrates introduces the doctrine of recollection as a response to Meno’s paradox. We don’t learn anything new; rather, we recall knowledge from our previous lives.

Socrates demonstrates this by questioning a slave boy about geometry. Through leading questions, Socrates guides the boy to solve a complex problem despite his lack of prior training.

The implication? The slave must have had innate ideas of geometry from a past existence. His latent knowledge was waiting to be uncovered.

Socrates calls over one of Meno’s enslaved attendants and asks the boy, who has no mathematical experience, to solve a geometry problem. With Socrates’ guidance, the boy discovers how to double the area of a square, and Socrates suggests to Meno that what appears to be learning, then, is merely recollection: “These notions have just been stirred up in him, as in a dream.”

The demonstration with the slave boy is meant to show that even an uneducated person knows within their immortal soul from a previous life. They need the right questioning to “recollect” it.

The Theory of Reincarnation: Plato’s Meno

The doctrine of recollection is tied to the belief in reincarnation and the soul’s immortality. Socrates suggests that the human soul is eternal and has lived many past lives.

In those previous existences, the soul acquired knowledge of all things. But the trauma of birth made the soul forget. So what we call learning is the soul “recollecting” the knowledge it already possessed.

As Socrates puts it, “As the soul is immortal, has been born often and has seen all things here and in the underworld, there is nothing which it has not learned; so it is in no way surprising that it can recollect the things it knew before.”

According to Socrates, the practical purpose of the theory of recollection is to make Meno eager to learn without a teacher. The geometry lesson shows that we can learn things we do not yet know (at least not consciously) if they are entailed by other things that we already know or believe.

Socrates alleges that when the slave becomes aware of his own ignorance, he properly desires to overcome it by learning. This is meant to be an object lesson for Meno himself.

The notion that learning is recollection is supposed to show that learning is possible in spite of Meno’s paradox. We can search for things we don’t know, because in a sense, we already do know them. We just have to “recollect” that knowledge.

Criticisms of the Doctrine

The doctrine of recollection is not without its critics. Some argue that it doesn’t really solve the paradox of learning at all. After all, even if we accept that the slave boy had innate knowledge, he still didn’t know the answers before Socrates’ questioning.

Others point out that the theory rests on a belief in reincarnation, which is taken for granted rather than argued for. If we don’t accept the idea of an immortal soul that’s lived before, the doctrine loses its foundation.

There’s also the question of what exactly it means for the soul to “forget” and then “recollect” knowledge. Is it like a kind of amnesia that can be cured? Or a more metaphorical forgetting and remembering? The dialogue leaves this unclear.

Despite these issues, the doctrine of recollection remains a key part of Plato’s epistemology and metaphysics. It’s a powerful idea that knowledge is in some sense “within” us, waiting to be uncovered. And it has inspired thinkers and educators for centuries, even if not always taken literally.

True Belief vs. Knowledge

A key distinction that Socrates makes in the Meno is between true belief and knowledge. It’s not enough to have correct opinions. For Socrates, real knowledge is something more.

But what exactly is the difference? And why does it matter? Let’s dive in and see what we can recollect.

Socrates gives the example of the road to Larissa. If someone has true belief about the way, they’ll get there just as well as someone who has knowledge.

So functionally, true belief and knowledge can seem equivalent. But Socrates insists there’s a key difference.

True beliefs are not “tied down.” They’re like the statues of Daedalus, which run away if not fastened. True beliefs can be lost or changed by persuasion or time.

Knowledge, on the other hand, is stable and enduring. It’s tied down by “reasoning out the explanation.” Once you have knowledge, you have a permanent possession.

The Value of Each

So if true belief can serve just as well as knowledge (as in the Larissa example), why is knowledge more valuable? Socrates gives a few reasons.

First, knowledge is more reliable. If you have knowledge, you’ll always get it right. But if you rely on true belief, you might easily be persuaded otherwise.

Second, knowledge can be taught to others. If you really know something, you can explain the reasons behind it. But if you just have a true belief, you can’t pass that on effectively.

Finally, knowledge is tied to virtue. Socrates suggests that it’s not enough to do the right thing by accident or habit. To be truly virtuous, you need to know what virtue is.

So how do we get true beliefs and knowledge? Socrates doesn’t give a full theory, but he drops some hints.

True beliefs seem to come from sources like experience, tradition, or persuasion. The slave boy, for instance, acquired a true belief about geometry through Socrates’ questioning.

Knowledge, though, comes from something more. Socrates talks about the importance of “reasoning out the explanation” and tying down true beliefs with an “account” of the reasons why.

This process seems to involve inquiry, dialogue, and reflection. It’s not just accepting what others say but thinking it through for yourself until you understand.

Socrates’ Examples

Socrates gives a few examples to illustrate the difference between true belief and knowledge.

There’s the Larissa road, where true belief is sufficient to get you there. The Daedalus statue shows how true beliefs can “run away” if not tied down.

And there’s the implicit example of the slave boy. He acquires a true belief about doubling the square through Socrates’ questions. But does he know? It’s left ambiguous.

Perhaps the most important example, though, is Socrates himself. He always disavowed knowledge, claiming that he only had true beliefs.

Is this just Socratic irony? Or is he pointing to the difficulty and rarity of genuine knowledge?

In any case, the distinction between true belief and knowledge remains a live question. Is there a difference? If so, how do we acquire knowledge? And what role does it play in virtue and wisdom?

These are the provocative questions that Plato’s dialogues leave us with. They’re not so much about definitive answers as about the ongoing pursuit of truth and understanding.

The Socratic Method in the Meno: Plato’s Meno

The Meno explores philosophical ideas and showcases Socrates’ distinctive style of inquiry, known as the Socratic Method or elenchus.

This approach involves asking probing questions, exposing assumptions, and guiding people towards the truth. Let’s see how it plays out in the dialogue.

From the start, Socrates insists that he doesn’t know the answers to his questions. What he does know is how to ask the right questions to stimulate thinking.

With Meno, he asks, “What is virtue?” and keeps pushing for a satisfactory definition. With the slave boy, he asks leading questions to prompt insights about geometry.

In both cases, Socrates models a kind of inquiry that’s not about memorizing facts but about thinking through problems for yourself. He shows that we can make progress by asking the right questions.

Exposing Ignorance

Part of what makes the Socratic Method so powerful (and sometimes infuriating) is its ability to expose ignorance. Socrates is a master at revealing what people don’t know, even when they think they do.

With Meno, he shows that Meno’s confident definitions of virtue are inadequate. With Anytus, he suggests that even the most prominent Athenians don’t know how to teach virtue.

The slave boy demonstration is the clearest example. The boy starts out thinking he knows the answer, but Socrates quickly leads him to contradict himself. Only then is he ready to learn.

For Socrates, this exposure of ignorance is a necessary first step. We have to recognize what we don’t know before we can start to learn. It’s a kind of intellectual humility that opens the door to wisdom.

However, the Socratic Method isn’t just about tearing down false beliefs. It’s also about constructively guiding people towards truth.

We see this, especially with the slave boy. Socrates doesn’t just tell him the answer. He asks a series of questions that lead the boy to figure it out for himself.

This is the heart of Socratic teaching. It’s not about imparting information but drawing out the knowledge already within. Socrates guides the boy, but the boy makes the discoveries.

The same could be said for the dialogue as a whole. Socrates guides Meno (and the reader) through a series of questions and arguments. The goal is not to dictate conclusions but to stimulate independent thinking.

Limitations of the Method: Plato’s Meno

For all its strengths, the Socratic Method has some limitations. The Meno itself points to a few.

First, it relies heavily on the questioner’s skill. Socrates is a master at crafting his questions to lead in certain directions. However, the method could be manipulative or misleading in the wrong hands.

Second, it doesn’t always reach a definite conclusion. The Meno ends in aporia, or puzzlement, about the nature of virtue. The Socratic approach can clarify issues and expose problems but doesn’t guarantee answers.

Finally, the method works best with interlocutors willing to play along. Meno becomes increasingly resistant to Socrates’ questions and, at one point, even accuses him of sorcery. For the elenchus to work, the participants must engage in good faith.

Despite these limitations, the Socratic Method has been enormously influential. It’s a model of critical thinking that challenges us to question our assumptions, follow the argument where it leads, and form our own reasoned judgments.

And it’s a powerful reminder that pursuing wisdom is a lifelong process. As Socrates would say, the unexamined life is not worth living.

Historical and Philosophical Context

To truly grasp the depth and significance of Plato’s Meno, we need to understand its historical and philosophical context. Although this dialogue is a product of its time, its themes and ideas transcend the boundaries of ancient philosophy and continue to influence thought to this day.

Plato, the author of the Meno, was a prominent Athenian philosopher who lived from approximately 428 to 348 BCE. He was a student of Socrates and later founded the Academy in Athens, a renowned center of learning in the ancient world.

Plato’s Life and Works

Plato’s works, written primarily in dialogues, cover a wide range of philosophical topics, including ethics, politics, metaphysics, and epistemology. The Meno is one of his earlier dialogues, believed to have been written around 385 BCE.

Plato discusses what virtue really is and whether it’s something you can actually teach, along with a few other big ideas. He does so through the character of Socrates, his teacher, and the main protagonist in many of his dialogues.

The Sophists: Plato’s Meno

The Meno also provides insight into the intellectual climate of Athens in the 5th century BCE, particularly the influence of the Sophists. These traveling teachers offered instruction in various subjects, including rhetoric and philosophy, often for a fee.

Plato, through Socrates, often criticizes the Sophists for their emphasis on persuasion over truth and their claim to teach virtue. This criticism is evident in the Meno, particularly in the character of Anytus, who expresses disdain for the Sophists.

Athens in the 5th Century BCE

Athens in the 5th century BCE was a hub of intellectual and cultural activity. It was the birthplace of democracy and home to many of the great minds of the ancient world, including Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle.

But at the same time, politics were all over the place, shaking things up quite a bit. The Meno is set against the backdrop of the Peloponnesian War between Athens and Sparta, which ended in Athens’ defeat in 404 BCE. Knowing the background helps us get why there’s a bit of political spice in their conversations.

Influence on Later Thought: Plato’s Meno

The Meno has had a significant influence on later philosophical thought. Its ideas about the nature of knowledge and learning, particularly the theory of recollection, have been explored and debated by philosophers for centuries.

The dialogue’s themes of virtue, education, and the philosophical method have also had a lasting impact. According to what’s been said in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, “The Meno” really breaks new ground when it comes to understanding knowledge. It contains the first Platonic discussion of the Theory of Recollection, the first discussion of Meno’s Paradox, and the first appearance of the Socratic Method of Hypothesis.”

In conclusion, the Meno is a product of its time, reflecting the intellectual and political climate of 5th century BCE Athens. Even after all this time, the core concepts and messages still hit home, weaving their way through centuries of philosophical debates and discussions right up to today. To engage with the Meno is to engage with some of the most fundamental questions of human existence, guided by one of the greatest minds in the history of philosophy.

Conclusion: Plato’s Meno

The journey through Plato’s Meno brings us full circle—from questioning virtue to exploring the essence of learning itself. This nudges us into realizing that hunting for wisdom isn’t about landing on the perfect answers but rather enjoying the journey of seeking them out. As we’ve dug deeper, we’ve stumbled upon ancient puzzles that really aren’t too different from today’s tough questions about what’s right and wrong, how we should teach and learn, and just how far people can go.

This dive into ancient philosophy proves one thing: Ideas don’t have an expiration date. They evolve with us over time—shaping thought patterns far beyond their inception era or geographical origins. So next time you ponder over what makes actions virtuous or wonder if true understanding is attainable remember—you’re partaking in a millennia-old tradition of inquiry.
And guess what? That conversation doesn’t end here; it’s just getting started.

Jon Giunta Editor in Chief

Jon has spent his lifetime researching and studying everything related to ancient history, civilizations, and mythology. He is fascinated with exploring the rich history of every region on Earth, diving headfirst into ancient societies and their beliefs.

See Full Bio

Ancient History Ancient Civilizations Archaeology Mythology